Murray v. State (Tex.Crim.App.)
In this case, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the holding of the 14th Court of Appeals (Harris County), that the Cognate-Pleadings test for lesser-included offenses applies to all prosecutions, be they before judge or jury.
What is the Cognate-Pleadings test you ask?
The Cognate-Pleadings approach to lesser-included offenses requires the court to look to the facts and elements as alleged in the charging instrument, and not just to the statutory elements of the offense, to determine whether there exists a lesser-included offense of the greater charged offense. See Hall v. State, 225 S.W.3d 524 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Sumber http://thetrialwarrior.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
loading...
Popular Posts
-
Sec. 49.065. ASSEMBLING OR OPERATING AN AMUSEMENT RIDE WHILE INTOXICATED. (a) A person commits an offense if the person is intoxicated while...
-
Sec. 71.02. ENGAGING IN ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. Text of subsection as amended by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 153, Sec. 2 (a) A pers...
-
Sec. 49.08. INTOXICATION MANSLAUGHTER. (a) A person commits an offense if the person: (1) operates a motor vehicle in a public place, o...
-
Sec. 71.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter, (a) "Combination" means three or more persons who collaborate in carrying on criminal ac...
-
Sec. 49.05. FLYING WHILE INTOXICATED. (a) A person commits an offense if the person is intoxicated while operating an aircraft. (b) Except a...
0 comments:
Post a Comment